Spyrosoft vs ScienceSoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Spyrosoft (3.9/5) edges ahead of ScienceSoft (3.7/5) overall. Spyrosoft is the better choice for EU automotive and EV-charging embedded teams. ScienceSoft is the stronger option for healthcare IoT platforms with light firmware needs. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Spyrosoft vs ScienceSoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Spyrosoft | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 1989 |
| HQ | Wrocław, Poland | McKinney, Texas, USA |
| Team size | 1,500+ | 750+ |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Polish delivery for embedded HMI, EV charging and embedded security testing | Healthcare IT and IoT platform experience, with security testing in-house |
| Pricing model | Time & materials, dedicated team | Fixed project, time & materials |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | C, C++, Qt | C, C++, FreeRTOS |
| Industries served | Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Aerospace & defence | Medical devices, Industrial IoT |
Spyrosoft vs ScienceSoft: overview
Spyrosoft
Spyrosoft was established in Wrocław in 2016 and grew quickly to more than 1,500 staff and roughly $122 million in 2024 revenue across about 15 offices. Its embedded unit works on HMI software, automotive systems, EV-charging firmware testing and embedded security, including secure boot and OTA updates. It also has a defence and cybersecurity line. The firm is a good fit for EU buyers who need Polish delivery and a mix of embedded and application engineers.
ScienceSoft
ScienceSoft traces its origins to a cooperative founded in 1989 and is now headquartered in McKinney, Texas, with about 750 staff. It has offered IoT services since 2011, with projects such as the AKLOS Health physiotherapy platform, and lists embedded software among its services. Most of its revenue comes from healthcare IT, finance IT, data analytics and security testing. For firmware buyers it is mainly useful when the device side is small and the larger job is the platform around it.
Services and capabilities: Spyrosoft vs ScienceSoft
| Capability | Spyrosoft | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Bare-metal & RTOS firmware | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded Linux & BSP | ✓ | ✗ |
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Wireless & IoT connectivity | ✗ | ✓ |
| Secure boot & OTA | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware testing & HIL | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Spyrosoft vs ScienceSoft
| Framework / platform | Spyrosoft | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | ✓ |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| Yocto | N/A | N/A |
| AUTOSAR | ✓ | N/A |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| Nordic | N/A | N/A |
| NXP | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Spyrosoft vs ScienceSoft
| Criterion | Spyrosoft | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time & materials | Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Spyrosoft vs ScienceSoft
| Dimension | Spyrosoft | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Aerospace & defence | Medical devices, Industrial IoT |
| Best use cases | Building a Qt-based HMI for an EV charger, Running a security assessment of a device's firmware update path | Building a remote patient monitoring platform with BLE device integration, Security testing an IoT product's cloud and mobile components |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Spyrosoft vs ScienceSoft: pros and cons
| Spyrosoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Embedded HMI and Qt experience for automotive and industrial displays |
| + | Embedded penetration testing and secure-boot work |
| + | EU contracts and Polish engineering rates |
| - | Rapid growth since 2016 means team seniority can vary |
| - | Embedded is one unit within a broad software company |
| ScienceSoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Long healthcare IT history useful for connected medical platforms |
| + | In-house security testing team |
| + | Fixed-price proposals available for well-defined scopes |
| - | Firmware is a minor service line, and public embedded case studies are few |
| - | No hardware design |
| - | Better suited to the platform around a device than to the device itself |
Who should choose Spyrosoft?
A typical fit: building a Qt-based HMI for an EV charger.
Polish delivery for embedded HMI, EV charging and embedded security testing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Aerospace & defence.
Who should choose ScienceSoft?
A typical fit: building a remote patient monitoring platform with BLE device integration.
Healthcare IT and IoT platform experience, with security testing in-house. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Industrial IoT.
Decision matrix: Spyrosoft vs ScienceSoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | ScienceSoft |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Spyrosoft |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Spyrosoft (Not disclosed) vs ScienceSoft (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Spyrosoft |
| You need engineers to extend your own firmware team | Spyrosoft |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Spyrosoft vs ScienceSoft
| Use case | Spyrosoft fit | ScienceSoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building a Qt-based HMI for an EV charger | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| Running a security assessment of a device's firmware update path | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| Building a remote patient monitoring platform with BLE device integration | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
| Security testing an IoT product's cloud and mobile components | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
| Fixed-price firmware build | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
| Extending an in-house firmware team | Strong | Strong | Both |
Verdict: Spyrosoft vs ScienceSoft
Spyrosoft (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Polish delivery for embedded HMI, EV charging and embedded security testing.
ScienceSoft (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need security testing an IoT product's cloud and mobile components. If your situation matches that, ScienceSoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Spyrosoft vs ScienceSoft FAQ
Is Spyrosoft better than ScienceSoft?
Spyrosoft (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Spyrosoft's strongest advantage: embedded HMI and Qt experience for automotive and industrial displays. ScienceSoft's strongest advantage: long healthcare IT history useful for connected medical platforms.
How do Spyrosoft and ScienceSoft differ in pricing?
Spyrosoft uses time & materials, dedicated team pricing. ScienceSoft uses fixed project, time & materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Spyrosoft or ScienceSoft?
Spyrosoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Spyrosoft and ScienceSoft?
Spyrosoft's primary differentiator is: polish delivery for embedded HMI, EV charging and embedded security testing. ScienceSoft's primary differentiator is: healthcare IT and IoT platform experience, with security testing in-house. They also differ in team size (1,500+ vs 750+), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Automotive, Energy & EV charging vs Medical devices, Industrial IoT).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.