Dojo Five vs Spyrosoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Dojo Five (4.6/5) edges ahead of Spyrosoft (3.9/5) overall. Dojo Five is the better choice for product teams wanting firmware with CI and test automation. Spyrosoft is the stronger option for EU automotive and EV-charging embedded teams. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Dojo Five vs Spyrosoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Dojo Five | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 2016 |
| HQ | Saint Paul, MN, USA | Wrocław, Poland |
| Team size | 11–50 | 1,500+ |
| Rating | 4.6 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Firmware-only consultancy that also sells its own embedded DevOps product, EmbedOps | Polish delivery for embedded HMI, EV charging and embedded security testing |
| Pricing model | Time & materials, fixed project | Time & materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | C, C++, Zephyr | C, C++, Qt |
| Industries served | Medical devices, Consumer electronics, Industrial IoT | Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Aerospace & defence |
Dojo Five vs Spyrosoft: overview
Dojo Five
Where most vendors on this list sell hardware and firmware together, Dojo Five sells only firmware, plus the tooling around it. The Saint Paul, Minnesota company was set up in 2018 and employs a few dozen engineers, most of them working remotely across North America. Alongside contract development it sells EmbedOps, a DevOps product for embedded teams that runs containerized builds, unit tests and static analysis in CI. Dojo Five is a Nordic Semiconductor partner, and its client work leans toward connected medical, consumer and industrial devices built on Cortex-M parts.
Spyrosoft
Spyrosoft was established in Wrocław in 2016 and grew quickly to more than 1,500 staff and roughly $122 million in 2024 revenue across about 15 offices. Its embedded unit works on HMI software, automotive systems, EV-charging firmware testing and embedded security, including secure boot and OTA updates. It also has a defence and cybersecurity line. The firm is a good fit for EU buyers who need Polish delivery and a mix of embedded and application engineers.
Services and capabilities: Dojo Five vs Spyrosoft
| Capability | Dojo Five | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Bare-metal & RTOS firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded Linux & BSP | ✗ | ✓ |
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Wireless & IoT connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| Secure boot & OTA | ✗ | ✓ |
| FPGA development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware testing & HIL | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Dojo Five vs Spyrosoft
| Framework / platform | Dojo Five | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | ✓ |
| Yocto | N/A | N/A |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | ✓ |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| Nordic | ✓ | N/A |
| NXP | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Dojo Five vs Spyrosoft
| Criterion | Dojo Five | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Fixed project, Time & materials | Dedicated team, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Dojo Five vs Spyrosoft
| Dimension | Dojo Five | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Medical devices, Consumer electronics, Industrial IoT | Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Aerospace & defence |
| Best use cases | Setting up automated firmware builds, unit tests and static analysis for an in-house team, Writing Zephyr firmware for a Nordic-based Bluetooth LE wearable | Building a Qt-based HMI for an EV charger, Running a security assessment of a device's firmware update path |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Dedicated team |
Dojo Five vs Spyrosoft: pros and cons
| Dojo Five | |
|---|---|
| + | Every engineer works on firmware, so you never get a web developer reassigned to your bootloader |
| + | Clients keep the CI setup, unit-test harness and Docker build images after the engagement ends |
| + | Nordic partner status and heavy Zephyr use suit Bluetooth LE and cellular IoT products |
| + | Remote model makes it easy to embed a Dojo Five engineer inside an existing in-house firmware team |
| - | No in-house PCB or electrical design, so hardware has to come from you or another partner |
| - | A team of a few dozen people limits how many parallel workstreams it can staff |
| - | Delivery is North America–focused, which can mean limited overlap for European or Asian clients |
| Spyrosoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Embedded HMI and Qt experience for automotive and industrial displays |
| + | Embedded penetration testing and secure-boot work |
| + | EU contracts and Polish engineering rates |
| - | Rapid growth since 2016 means team seniority can vary |
| - | Embedded is one unit within a broad software company |
Who should choose Dojo Five?
A typical fit: setting up automated firmware builds, unit tests and static analysis for an in-house team.
Firmware-only consultancy that also sells its own embedded DevOps product, EmbedOps. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Consumer electronics, Industrial IoT.
Who should choose Spyrosoft?
A typical fit: building a Qt-based HMI for an EV charger.
Polish delivery for embedded HMI, EV charging and embedded security testing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Aerospace & defence.
Decision matrix: Dojo Five vs Spyrosoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Dojo Five |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Spyrosoft |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Dojo Five (Not disclosed) vs Spyrosoft (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Dojo Five |
| You need engineers to extend your own firmware team | Spyrosoft |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Dojo Five |
Use case fit: Dojo Five vs Spyrosoft
| Use case | Dojo Five fit | Spyrosoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Setting up automated firmware builds, unit tests and static analysis for an in-house team | Strong | Limited | Dojo Five |
| Writing Zephyr firmware for a Nordic-based Bluetooth LE wearable | Strong | Limited | Dojo Five |
| Building a Qt-based HMI for an EV charger | Limited | Strong | Spyrosoft |
| Running a security assessment of a device's firmware update path | Limited | Strong | Spyrosoft |
| Fixed-price firmware build | Strong | Limited | Dojo Five |
| Extending an in-house firmware team | Strong | Strong | Both |
Verdict: Dojo Five vs Spyrosoft
Dojo Five (4.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Firmware-only consultancy that also sells its own embedded DevOps product, EmbedOps.
Spyrosoft (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need running a security assessment of a device's firmware update path. If your situation matches that, Spyrosoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Dojo Five vs Spyrosoft FAQ
Is Dojo Five better than Spyrosoft?
Dojo Five (4.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Dojo Five's strongest advantage: every engineer works on firmware, so you never get a web developer reassigned to your bootloader. Spyrosoft's strongest advantage: embedded HMI and Qt experience for automotive and industrial displays.
How do Dojo Five and Spyrosoft differ in pricing?
Dojo Five uses time & materials, fixed project pricing. Spyrosoft uses time & materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Dojo Five or Spyrosoft?
Spyrosoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Dojo Five and Spyrosoft?
Dojo Five's primary differentiator is: firmware-only consultancy that also sells its own embedded DevOps product, EmbedOps. Spyrosoft's primary differentiator is: polish delivery for embedded HMI, EV charging and embedded security testing. They also differ in team size (11–50 vs 1,500+), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Medical devices, Consumer electronics vs Automotive, Energy & EV charging).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.