Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of ScienceSoft (3.7/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected devices needing firmware and electronics together. ScienceSoft is the stronger option for healthcare IoT platforms with light firmware needs. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1989 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Hamburg, Germany; London, UK; Kraków, Poland) | McKinney, Texas, USA |
| Team size | 200+ | 750+ |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and an in-house hardware lab under one contract, with NXP, Microchip and ST partner status | Healthcare IT and IoT platform experience, with security testing in-house |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, time & materials, dedicated team | Fixed project, time & materials |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | C, C++, FreeRTOS | C, C++, FreeRTOS |
| Industries served | Medical devices, Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Logistics & transportation, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics | Medical devices, Industrial IoT |
Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Lemberg Solutions takes a device from schematic to field updates under one roof: electrical engineering, bare-metal and RTOS firmware, embedded Linux, FPGA programming, GUI work, connectivity and edge AI. The company started in Lviv in 2007, now has more than 200 people, and also runs offices in Hamburg, London and Kraków. Its firmware practice works across STM32, NXP i.MX and LPC, Microchip PIC and SAM, Nordic and Espressif parts, with FreeRTOS, Zephyr, Azure RTOS and VxWorks listed in its stack, and it holds partner status with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics. Named clients include Astronics, Caltech, Speede, Ferno, Cellink and Bosch Rexroth. Processes are certified to ISO 27001 and ISO 9001, and an in-house lab with oscilloscopes, spectrum analyzers and evaluation kits is used to validate firmware on real hardware before it ships.
ScienceSoft
ScienceSoft traces its origins to a cooperative founded in 1989 and is now headquartered in McKinney, Texas, with about 750 staff. It has offered IoT services since 2011, with projects such as the AKLOS Health physiotherapy platform, and lists embedded software among its services. Most of its revenue comes from healthcare IT, finance IT, data analytics and security testing. For firmware buyers it is mainly useful when the device side is small and the larger job is the platform around it.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Bare-metal & RTOS firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded Linux & BSP | ✓ | ✗ |
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Wireless & IoT connectivity | ✓ | ✓ |
| Secure boot & OTA | ✓ | ✓ |
| FPGA development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware testing & HIL | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| Yocto | N/A | N/A |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| Nordic | ✓ | N/A |
| NXP | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time & materials | Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | ScienceSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Medical devices, Automotive, Energy & EV charging | Medical devices, Industrial IoT |
| Best use cases | Porting medical-device firmware to a new STM32 family while keeping power consumption down, Auditing and refactoring unstable connectivity firmware on ESP32 or Nordic parts | Building a remote patient monitoring platform with BLE device integration, Security testing an IoT product's cloud and mobile components |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | One team covers schematics, PCB layout, MCU firmware, cloud back end and the companion app, so integration problems surface inside a single project plan |
| + | ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certified, with secure boot, image signing and OTA rollback offered as standard firmware work items |
| + | Partner status with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics gives earlier access to silicon support and reference designs |
| + | Edge AI experience runs from sensor integration and DSP to on-device inference and computer vision |
| + | In-house lab lets the team validate firmware against real boards and RF conditions before the client receives a build |
| + | All intellectual property rights transfer to the client, across consulting, team-extension and full-product engagements |
| - | Mass production is not handled in-house; the team supports a product through development and maintenance but does not manufacture finished devices |
| - | Regulatory certification is not obtained on the client's behalf; Lemberg supplies the technical documentation and engineering support for approvals |
| - | Broad scope means a buyer who only needs a single low-level driver may be paying for capabilities they will not use |
| ScienceSoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Long healthcare IT history useful for connected medical platforms |
| + | In-house security testing team |
| + | Fixed-price proposals available for well-defined scopes |
| - | Firmware is a minor service line, and public embedded case studies are few |
| - | No hardware design |
| - | Better suited to the platform around a device than to the device itself |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: porting medical-device firmware to a new STM32 family while keeping power consumption down.
Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and an in-house hardware lab under one contract, with NXP, Microchip and ST partner status. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Logistics & transportation, Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics.
Who should choose ScienceSoft?
A typical fit: building a remote patient monitoring platform with BLE device integration.
Healthcare IT and IoT platform experience, with security testing in-house. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Industrial IoT.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not disclosed) vs ScienceSoft (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need engineers to extend your own firmware team | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | ScienceSoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porting medical-device firmware to a new STM32 family while keeping power consumption down | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Auditing and refactoring unstable connectivity firmware on ESP32 or Nordic parts | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| Building a remote patient monitoring platform with BLE device integration | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
| Security testing an IoT product's cloud and mobile components | Limited | Strong | ScienceSoft |
| Fixed-price firmware build | Strong | Strong | Both |
| Extending an in-house firmware team | Strong | Strong | Both |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and an in-house hardware lab under one contract, with NXP, Microchip and ST partner status.
ScienceSoft (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need security testing an IoT product's cloud and mobile components. If your situation matches that, ScienceSoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs ScienceSoft FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than ScienceSoft?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: one team covers schematics, PCB layout, MCU firmware, cloud back end and the companion app, so integration problems surface inside a single project plan. ScienceSoft's strongest advantage: long healthcare IT history useful for connected medical platforms.
How do Lemberg Solutions and ScienceSoft differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses fixed project, time & materials, dedicated team pricing. ScienceSoft uses fixed project, time & materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or ScienceSoft?
ScienceSoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and ScienceSoft?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: electrical engineering, firmware, cloud and an in-house hardware lab under one contract, with NXP, Microchip and ST partner status. ScienceSoft's primary differentiator is: healthcare IT and IoT platform experience, with security testing in-house. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 750+), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Medical devices, Automotive vs Medical devices, Industrial IoT).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.