Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Sirin Software (4.2/5) edges ahead of Spyrosoft (3.9/5) overall. Sirin Software is the better choice for US buyers wanting Ukrainian embedded Linux rates. Spyrosoft is the stronger option for EU automotive and EV-charging embedded teams. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Sirin Software | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2016 |
| HQ | Pompano Beach, Florida, USA (R&D in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine) | Wrocław, Poland |
| Team size | 11–50 | 1,500+ |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | US contracting entity with a Ukrainian embedded Linux and firmware team | Polish delivery for embedded HMI, EV charging and embedded security testing |
| Pricing model | Time & materials, dedicated team | Time & materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | C, C++, Embedded Linux | C, C++, Qt |
| Industries served | Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Telecom & broadcast | Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Aerospace & defence |
Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft: overview
Sirin Software
Sirin Software is registered in Florida, but its engineering happens at R&D offices in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk. The company dates from 2014 and focuses on embedded Linux, firmware and IoT device software, with directory headcount estimates between roughly 25 and 50. Clutch reviews describe board bring-up, driver development and IoT gateway projects for US and European hardware companies. For buyers who want a US contracting entity and Ukrainian engineering rates, it is one of the more direct options here.
Spyrosoft
Spyrosoft was established in Wrocław in 2016 and grew quickly to more than 1,500 staff and roughly $122 million in 2024 revenue across about 15 offices. Its embedded unit works on HMI software, automotive systems, EV-charging firmware testing and embedded security, including secure boot and OTA updates. It also has a defence and cybersecurity line. The firm is a good fit for EU buyers who need Polish delivery and a mix of embedded and application engineers.
Services and capabilities: Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft
| Capability | Sirin Software | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Bare-metal & RTOS firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded Linux & BSP | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Wireless & IoT connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| Secure boot & OTA | ✗ | ✓ |
| FPGA development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware testing & HIL | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft
| Framework / platform | Sirin Software | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| Yocto | ✓ | N/A |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | ✓ |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| Nordic | N/A | N/A |
| NXP | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft
| Criterion | Sirin Software | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time & materials | Dedicated team, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft
| Dimension | Sirin Software | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Telecom & broadcast | Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Aerospace & defence |
| Best use cases | Building a Yocto image and drivers for an IoT gateway, Extending a small in-house firmware team with Linux specialists | Building a Qt-based HMI for an EV charger, Running a security assessment of a device's firmware update path |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft: pros and cons
| Sirin Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Embedded Linux, Yocto and Buildroot work is the core of its portfolio |
| + | US entity simplifies contracts for American buyers |
| + | Rates closer to Eastern European than US levels |
| - | Directory headcount estimates vary widely, so confirm team size and seniority up front |
| - | No in-house hardware design |
| - | Delivery depends on engineers based in Ukraine, which some buyers will want covered in continuity planning |
| Spyrosoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Embedded HMI and Qt experience for automotive and industrial displays |
| + | Embedded penetration testing and secure-boot work |
| + | EU contracts and Polish engineering rates |
| - | Rapid growth since 2016 means team seniority can vary |
| - | Embedded is one unit within a broad software company |
Who should choose Sirin Software?
A typical fit: building a Yocto image and drivers for an IoT gateway.
US contracting entity with a Ukrainian embedded Linux and firmware team. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Telecom & broadcast.
Who should choose Spyrosoft?
A typical fit: building a Qt-based HMI for an EV charger.
Polish delivery for embedded HMI, EV charging and embedded security testing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Aerospace & defence.
Decision matrix: Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Sirin Software |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Sirin Software (Not disclosed) vs Spyrosoft (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Sirin Software |
| You need engineers to extend your own firmware team | Sirin Software |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft
| Use case | Sirin Software fit | Spyrosoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building a Yocto image and drivers for an IoT gateway | Strong | Limited | Sirin Software |
| Extending a small in-house firmware team with Linux specialists | Strong | Limited | Sirin Software |
| Building a Qt-based HMI for an EV charger | Limited | Strong | Spyrosoft |
| Running a security assessment of a device's firmware update path | Limited | Strong | Spyrosoft |
| Fixed-price firmware build | Limited | Limited | Neither stands out |
| Extending an in-house firmware team | Strong | Strong | Both |
Verdict: Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft
Sirin Software (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. US contracting entity with a Ukrainian embedded Linux and firmware team.
Spyrosoft (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need running a security assessment of a device's firmware update path. If your situation matches that, Spyrosoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft FAQ
Is Sirin Software better than Spyrosoft?
Sirin Software (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Sirin Software's strongest advantage: embedded Linux, Yocto and Buildroot work is the core of its portfolio. Spyrosoft's strongest advantage: embedded HMI and Qt experience for automotive and industrial displays.
How do Sirin Software and Spyrosoft differ in pricing?
Sirin Software uses time & materials, dedicated team pricing. Spyrosoft uses time & materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Sirin Software or Spyrosoft?
Spyrosoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Sirin Software and Spyrosoft?
Sirin Software's primary differentiator is: US contracting entity with a Ukrainian embedded Linux and firmware team. Spyrosoft's primary differentiator is: polish delivery for embedded HMI, EV charging and embedded security testing. They also differ in team size (11–50 vs 1,500+), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics vs Automotive, Energy & EV charging).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.