Dojo Five vs Sirin Software: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Dojo Five (4.6/5) edges ahead of Sirin Software (4.2/5) overall. Dojo Five is the better choice for product teams wanting firmware with CI and test automation. Sirin Software is the stronger option for US buyers wanting Ukrainian embedded Linux rates. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Dojo Five vs Sirin Software: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Dojo Five | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 2014 |
| HQ | Saint Paul, MN, USA | Pompano Beach, Florida, USA (R&D in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine) |
| Team size | 11–50 | 11–50 |
| Rating | 4.6 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Firmware-only consultancy that also sells its own embedded DevOps product, EmbedOps | US contracting entity with a Ukrainian embedded Linux and firmware team |
| Pricing model | Time & materials, fixed project | Time & materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | C, C++, Zephyr | C, C++, Embedded Linux |
| Industries served | Medical devices, Consumer electronics, Industrial IoT | Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Telecom & broadcast |
Dojo Five vs Sirin Software: overview
Dojo Five
Where most vendors on this list sell hardware and firmware together, Dojo Five sells only firmware, plus the tooling around it. The Saint Paul, Minnesota company was set up in 2018 and employs a few dozen engineers, most of them working remotely across North America. Alongside contract development it sells EmbedOps, a DevOps product for embedded teams that runs containerized builds, unit tests and static analysis in CI. Dojo Five is a Nordic Semiconductor partner, and its client work leans toward connected medical, consumer and industrial devices built on Cortex-M parts.
Sirin Software
Sirin Software is registered in Florida, but its engineering happens at R&D offices in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk. The company dates from 2014 and focuses on embedded Linux, firmware and IoT device software, with directory headcount estimates between roughly 25 and 50. Clutch reviews describe board bring-up, driver development and IoT gateway projects for US and European hardware companies. For buyers who want a US contracting entity and Ukrainian engineering rates, it is one of the more direct options here.
Services and capabilities: Dojo Five vs Sirin Software
| Capability | Dojo Five | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Bare-metal & RTOS firmware | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux & BSP | ✗ | ✓ |
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Wireless & IoT connectivity | ✓ | ✓ |
| Secure boot & OTA | ✗ | ✗ |
| FPGA development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware testing & HIL | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Dojo Five vs Sirin Software
| Framework / platform | Dojo Five | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Zephyr | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | ✓ |
| Yocto | N/A | ✓ |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| Nordic | ✓ | N/A |
| NXP | N/A | ✓ |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Dojo Five vs Sirin Software
| Criterion | Dojo Five | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Fixed project, Time & materials | Dedicated team, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Dojo Five vs Sirin Software
| Dimension | Dojo Five | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Medical devices, Consumer electronics, Industrial IoT | Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Telecom & broadcast |
| Best use cases | Setting up automated firmware builds, unit tests and static analysis for an in-house team, Writing Zephyr firmware for a Nordic-based Bluetooth LE wearable | Building a Yocto image and drivers for an IoT gateway, Extending a small in-house firmware team with Linux specialists |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Dedicated team |
Dojo Five vs Sirin Software: pros and cons
| Dojo Five | |
|---|---|
| + | Every engineer works on firmware, so you never get a web developer reassigned to your bootloader |
| + | Clients keep the CI setup, unit-test harness and Docker build images after the engagement ends |
| + | Nordic partner status and heavy Zephyr use suit Bluetooth LE and cellular IoT products |
| + | Remote model makes it easy to embed a Dojo Five engineer inside an existing in-house firmware team |
| - | No in-house PCB or electrical design, so hardware has to come from you or another partner |
| - | A team of a few dozen people limits how many parallel workstreams it can staff |
| - | Delivery is North America–focused, which can mean limited overlap for European or Asian clients |
| Sirin Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Embedded Linux, Yocto and Buildroot work is the core of its portfolio |
| + | US entity simplifies contracts for American buyers |
| + | Rates closer to Eastern European than US levels |
| - | Directory headcount estimates vary widely, so confirm team size and seniority up front |
| - | No in-house hardware design |
| - | Delivery depends on engineers based in Ukraine, which some buyers will want covered in continuity planning |
Who should choose Dojo Five?
A typical fit: setting up automated firmware builds, unit tests and static analysis for an in-house team.
Firmware-only consultancy that also sells its own embedded DevOps product, EmbedOps. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Consumer electronics, Industrial IoT.
Who should choose Sirin Software?
A typical fit: building a Yocto image and drivers for an IoT gateway.
US contracting entity with a Ukrainian embedded Linux and firmware team. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Telecom & broadcast.
Decision matrix: Dojo Five vs Sirin Software
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Dojo Five |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Sirin Software |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Dojo Five (Not disclosed) vs Sirin Software (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Dojo Five |
| You need engineers to extend your own firmware team | Sirin Software |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Dojo Five |
Use case fit: Dojo Five vs Sirin Software
| Use case | Dojo Five fit | Sirin Software fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Setting up automated firmware builds, unit tests and static analysis for an in-house team | Strong | Limited | Dojo Five |
| Writing Zephyr firmware for a Nordic-based Bluetooth LE wearable | Strong | Limited | Dojo Five |
| Building a Yocto image and drivers for an IoT gateway | Limited | Strong | Sirin Software |
| Extending a small in-house firmware team with Linux specialists | Limited | Strong | Sirin Software |
| Fixed-price firmware build | Strong | Limited | Dojo Five |
| Extending an in-house firmware team | Strong | Strong | Both |
Verdict: Dojo Five vs Sirin Software
Dojo Five (4.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Firmware-only consultancy that also sells its own embedded DevOps product, EmbedOps.
Sirin Software (4.2/5) is worth a look if you need extending a small in-house firmware team with Linux specialists. If your situation matches that, Sirin Software is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Dojo Five vs Sirin Software FAQ
Is Dojo Five better than Sirin Software?
Dojo Five (4.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Dojo Five's strongest advantage: every engineer works on firmware, so you never get a web developer reassigned to your bootloader. Sirin Software's strongest advantage: embedded Linux, Yocto and Buildroot work is the core of its portfolio.
How do Dojo Five and Sirin Software differ in pricing?
Dojo Five uses time & materials, fixed project pricing. Sirin Software uses time & materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Dojo Five or Sirin Software?
Dojo Five is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Dojo Five and Sirin Software?
Dojo Five's primary differentiator is: firmware-only consultancy that also sells its own embedded DevOps product, EmbedOps. Sirin Software's primary differentiator is: US contracting entity with a Ukrainian embedded Linux and firmware team. They also differ in team size (11–50 vs 11–50), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Medical devices, Consumer electronics vs Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.