Spyrosoft vs Very: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Spyrosoft (3.9/5) edges ahead of Very (3.8/5) overall. Spyrosoft is the better choice for EU automotive and EV-charging embedded teams. Very is the stronger option for US companies building a first connected product. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Spyrosoft vs Very: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Spyrosoft | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 2011 |
| HQ | Wrocław, Poland | USA (fully distributed) |
| Team size | 1,500+ | 51–200 |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Polish delivery for embedded HMI, EV charging and embedded security testing | Product-strategy-led IoT development with Nerves and Elixir experience |
| Pricing model | Time & materials, dedicated team | Time & materials, fixed project |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | C, C++, Qt | C, Elixir, Nerves |
| Industries served | Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Aerospace & defence | Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Energy & EV charging |
Spyrosoft vs Very: overview
Spyrosoft
Spyrosoft was established in Wrocław in 2016 and grew quickly to more than 1,500 staff and roughly $122 million in 2024 revenue across about 15 offices. Its embedded unit works on HMI software, automotive systems, EV-charging firmware testing and embedded security, including secure boot and OTA updates. It also has a defence and cybersecurity line. The firm is a good fit for EU buyers who need Polish delivery and a mix of embedded and application engineers.
Very
Very is a US IoT engineering firm that grew out of a design and development agency founded in 2011 and now works as a distributed team, with its earlier base in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Directory listings put its size at 51 to 200 people. It builds IoT products across hardware engineering, firmware, mobile apps and data, and it hired a co-author of the Nerves project, which runs Elixir on embedded Linux. Reviews mention hardware, firmware, React Native and AI feature work, so firmware is one part of a broader product offer.
Services and capabilities: Spyrosoft vs Very
| Capability | Spyrosoft | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Bare-metal & RTOS firmware | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded Linux & BSP | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✓ |
| Wireless & IoT connectivity | ✗ | ✓ |
| Secure boot & OTA | ✓ | ✗ |
| FPGA development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware testing & HIL | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Spyrosoft vs Very
| Framework / platform | Spyrosoft | Very |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| Yocto | N/A | N/A |
| AUTOSAR | ✓ | N/A |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| Nordic | N/A | ✓ |
| NXP | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Spyrosoft vs Very
| Criterion | Spyrosoft | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time & materials | Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Spyrosoft vs Very
| Dimension | Spyrosoft | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Aerospace & defence | Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Energy & EV charging |
| Best use cases | Building a Qt-based HMI for an EV charger, Running a security assessment of a device's firmware update path | Taking a first IoT product from concept to pilot, Building Nerves-based device software on embedded Linux |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Spyrosoft vs Very: pros and cons
| Spyrosoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Embedded HMI and Qt experience for automotive and industrial displays |
| + | Embedded penetration testing and secure-boot work |
| + | EU contracts and Polish engineering rates |
| - | Rapid growth since 2016 means team seniority can vary |
| - | Embedded is one unit within a broad software company |
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | Combines product strategy, design and engineering for teams new to hardware |
| + | Nerves experience is rare and useful for Elixir-based device software |
| + | Delivers the device, app and data platform together |
| - | Firmware is one part of a product agency offer |
| - | US rates without a lower-cost offshore option |
| - | Office location and headcount details vary between sources |
Who should choose Spyrosoft?
A typical fit: building a Qt-based HMI for an EV charger.
Polish delivery for embedded HMI, EV charging and embedded security testing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Aerospace & defence.
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: taking a first IoT product from concept to pilot.
Product-strategy-led IoT development with Nerves and Elixir experience. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Energy & EV charging.
Decision matrix: Spyrosoft vs Very
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Very |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Spyrosoft |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Spyrosoft (Not disclosed) vs Very (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Spyrosoft |
| You need engineers to extend your own firmware team | Spyrosoft |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Spyrosoft vs Very
| Use case | Spyrosoft fit | Very fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building a Qt-based HMI for an EV charger | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| Running a security assessment of a device's firmware update path | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| Taking a first IoT product from concept to pilot | Limited | Strong | Very |
| Building Nerves-based device software on embedded Linux | Limited | Strong | Very |
| Fixed-price firmware build | Limited | Strong | Very |
| Extending an in-house firmware team | Strong | Strong | Both |
Verdict: Spyrosoft vs Very
Spyrosoft (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Polish delivery for embedded HMI, EV charging and embedded security testing.
Very (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need building Nerves-based device software on embedded Linux. If your situation matches that, Very is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Spyrosoft vs Very FAQ
Is Spyrosoft better than Very?
Spyrosoft (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Spyrosoft's strongest advantage: embedded HMI and Qt experience for automotive and industrial displays. Very's strongest advantage: combines product strategy, design and engineering for teams new to hardware.
How do Spyrosoft and Very differ in pricing?
Spyrosoft uses time & materials, dedicated team pricing. Very uses time & materials, fixed project pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Spyrosoft or Very?
Very is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Spyrosoft and Very?
Spyrosoft's primary differentiator is: polish delivery for embedded HMI, EV charging and embedded security testing. Very's primary differentiator is: product-strategy-led IoT development with Nerves and Elixir experience. They also differ in team size (1,500+ vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Automotive, Energy & EV charging vs Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.