Spyrosoft vs Luxoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Spyrosoft (3.9/5) edges ahead of Luxoft (3.8/5) overall. Spyrosoft is the better choice for EU automotive and EV-charging embedded teams. Luxoft is the stronger option for automotive cockpit and ADAS software programmes. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Spyrosoft vs Luxoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Spyrosoft | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 2000 |
| HQ | Wrocław, Poland | Zug, Switzerland |
| Team size | 1,500+ | 15,000+ |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Polish delivery for embedded HMI, EV charging and embedded security testing | Automotive embedded and cockpit software practice inside DXC |
| Pricing model | Time & materials, dedicated team | Time & materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | C, C++, Qt | C++, AUTOSAR, QNX |
| Industries served | Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Aerospace & defence | Automotive, Telecom & broadcast |
Spyrosoft vs Luxoft: overview
Spyrosoft
Spyrosoft was established in Wrocław in 2016 and grew quickly to more than 1,500 staff and roughly $122 million in 2024 revenue across about 15 offices. Its embedded unit works on HMI software, automotive systems, EV-charging firmware testing and embedded security, including secure boot and OTA updates. It also has a defence and cybersecurity line. The firm is a good fit for EU buyers who need Polish delivery and a mix of embedded and application engineers.
Luxoft
Luxoft started in Moscow in 2000, is now headquartered in Zug, Switzerland, and has been part of DXC Technology since 2019. Its automotive business, marketed as DXC Luxoft Automotive, works on embedded systems, cockpit and infotainment software, ADAS and simulation, and grew through acquisitions including Objective GmbH in 2018 and CMORE Automotive in 2020. Group headcount estimates sit between about 13,000 and 18,000. Embedded MCU firmware outside automotive is not where it competes.
Services and capabilities: Spyrosoft vs Luxoft
| Capability | Spyrosoft | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Bare-metal & RTOS firmware | ✗ | ✗ |
| Embedded Linux & BSP | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Wireless & IoT connectivity | ✗ | ✗ |
| Secure boot & OTA | ✓ | ✗ |
| FPGA development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware testing & HIL | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Spyrosoft vs Luxoft
| Framework / platform | Spyrosoft | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | N/A | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| Yocto | N/A | N/A |
| AUTOSAR | ✓ | ✓ |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| Nordic | N/A | N/A |
| NXP | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Spyrosoft vs Luxoft
| Criterion | Spyrosoft | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time & materials | Dedicated team, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Spyrosoft vs Luxoft
| Dimension | Spyrosoft | Luxoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Aerospace & defence | Automotive, Telecom & broadcast |
| Best use cases | Building a Qt-based HMI for an EV charger, Running a security assessment of a device's firmware update path | Developing digital cockpit software for a vehicle platform, Building simulation and validation tooling for ADAS |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Spyrosoft vs Luxoft: pros and cons
| Spyrosoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Embedded HMI and Qt experience for automotive and industrial displays |
| + | Embedded penetration testing and secure-boot work |
| + | EU contracts and Polish engineering rates |
| - | Rapid growth since 2016 means team seniority can vary |
| - | Embedded is one unit within a broad software company |
| Luxoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Long track record with automotive OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers |
| + | Acquisitions added German automotive engineering capacity |
| + | Can run large, multi-site programmes |
| - | Owned by DXC since 2019, and its focus outside automotive embedded is limited |
| - | Not a practical choice for small MCU firmware projects |
| - | Delivery footprint changed significantly after 2022; confirm current team locations |
Who should choose Spyrosoft?
A typical fit: building a Qt-based HMI for an EV charger.
Polish delivery for embedded HMI, EV charging and embedded security testing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Energy & EV charging, Aerospace & defence.
Who should choose Luxoft?
A typical fit: developing digital cockpit software for a vehicle platform.
Automotive embedded and cockpit software practice inside DXC. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Telecom & broadcast.
Decision matrix: Spyrosoft vs Luxoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Spyrosoft |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Spyrosoft (Not disclosed) vs Luxoft (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Spyrosoft |
| You need engineers to extend your own firmware team | Spyrosoft |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Spyrosoft vs Luxoft
| Use case | Spyrosoft fit | Luxoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building a Qt-based HMI for an EV charger | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| Running a security assessment of a device's firmware update path | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| Developing digital cockpit software for a vehicle platform | Limited | Strong | Luxoft |
| Building simulation and validation tooling for ADAS | Limited | Strong | Luxoft |
| Fixed-price firmware build | Limited | Limited | Neither stands out |
| Extending an in-house firmware team | Strong | Strong | Both |
Verdict: Spyrosoft vs Luxoft
Spyrosoft (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Polish delivery for embedded HMI, EV charging and embedded security testing.
Luxoft (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need building simulation and validation tooling for ADAS. If your situation matches that, Luxoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Spyrosoft vs Luxoft FAQ
Is Spyrosoft better than Luxoft?
Spyrosoft (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Spyrosoft's strongest advantage: embedded HMI and Qt experience for automotive and industrial displays. Luxoft's strongest advantage: long track record with automotive OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers.
How do Spyrosoft and Luxoft differ in pricing?
Spyrosoft uses time & materials, dedicated team pricing. Luxoft uses time & materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Spyrosoft or Luxoft?
Luxoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Spyrosoft and Luxoft?
Spyrosoft's primary differentiator is: polish delivery for embedded HMI, EV charging and embedded security testing. Luxoft's primary differentiator is: automotive embedded and cockpit software practice inside DXC. They also differ in team size (1,500+ vs 15,000+), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Automotive, Energy & EV charging vs Automotive, Telecom & broadcast).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.