Sirin Software vs Very: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Sirin Software (4.2/5) edges ahead of Very (3.8/5) overall. Sirin Software is the better choice for US buyers wanting Ukrainian embedded Linux rates. Very is the stronger option for US companies building a first connected product. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Sirin Software vs Very: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Sirin Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2011 |
| HQ | Pompano Beach, Florida, USA (R&D in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine) | USA (fully distributed) |
| Team size | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | US contracting entity with a Ukrainian embedded Linux and firmware team | Product-strategy-led IoT development with Nerves and Elixir experience |
| Pricing model | Time & materials, dedicated team | Time & materials, fixed project |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | C, C++, Embedded Linux | C, Elixir, Nerves |
| Industries served | Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Telecom & broadcast | Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Energy & EV charging |
Sirin Software vs Very: overview
Sirin Software
Sirin Software is registered in Florida, but its engineering happens at R&D offices in Kyiv and Ivano-Frankivsk. The company dates from 2014 and focuses on embedded Linux, firmware and IoT device software, with directory headcount estimates between roughly 25 and 50. Clutch reviews describe board bring-up, driver development and IoT gateway projects for US and European hardware companies. For buyers who want a US contracting entity and Ukrainian engineering rates, it is one of the more direct options here.
Very
Very is a US IoT engineering firm that grew out of a design and development agency founded in 2011 and now works as a distributed team, with its earlier base in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Directory listings put its size at 51 to 200 people. It builds IoT products across hardware engineering, firmware, mobile apps and data, and it hired a co-author of the Nerves project, which runs Elixir on embedded Linux. Reviews mention hardware, firmware, React Native and AI feature work, so firmware is one part of a broader product offer.
Services and capabilities: Sirin Software vs Very
| Capability | Sirin Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Bare-metal & RTOS firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded Linux & BSP | ✓ | ✓ |
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✓ |
| Wireless & IoT connectivity | ✓ | ✓ |
| Secure boot & OTA | ✗ | ✗ |
| FPGA development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware testing & HIL | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Sirin Software vs Very
| Framework / platform | Sirin Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| Yocto | ✓ | N/A |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| STM32 | N/A | N/A |
| Nordic | N/A | ✓ |
| NXP | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Sirin Software vs Very
| Criterion | Sirin Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time & materials | Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Sirin Software vs Very
| Dimension | Sirin Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Telecom & broadcast | Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Energy & EV charging |
| Best use cases | Building a Yocto image and drivers for an IoT gateway, Extending a small in-house firmware team with Linux specialists | Taking a first IoT product from concept to pilot, Building Nerves-based device software on embedded Linux |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Sirin Software vs Very: pros and cons
| Sirin Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Embedded Linux, Yocto and Buildroot work is the core of its portfolio |
| + | US entity simplifies contracts for American buyers |
| + | Rates closer to Eastern European than US levels |
| - | Directory headcount estimates vary widely, so confirm team size and seniority up front |
| - | No in-house hardware design |
| - | Delivery depends on engineers based in Ukraine, which some buyers will want covered in continuity planning |
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | Combines product strategy, design and engineering for teams new to hardware |
| + | Nerves experience is rare and useful for Elixir-based device software |
| + | Delivers the device, app and data platform together |
| - | Firmware is one part of a product agency offer |
| - | US rates without a lower-cost offshore option |
| - | Office location and headcount details vary between sources |
Who should choose Sirin Software?
A typical fit: building a Yocto image and drivers for an IoT gateway.
US contracting entity with a Ukrainian embedded Linux and firmware team. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Telecom & broadcast.
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: taking a first IoT product from concept to pilot.
Product-strategy-led IoT development with Nerves and Elixir experience. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Energy & EV charging.
Decision matrix: Sirin Software vs Very
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Very |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Sirin Software |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Sirin Software (Not disclosed) vs Very (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Sirin Software |
| You need engineers to extend your own firmware team | Sirin Software |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Sirin Software vs Very
| Use case | Sirin Software fit | Very fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building a Yocto image and drivers for an IoT gateway | Strong | Limited | Sirin Software |
| Extending a small in-house firmware team with Linux specialists | Strong | Limited | Sirin Software |
| Taking a first IoT product from concept to pilot | Limited | Strong | Very |
| Building Nerves-based device software on embedded Linux | Limited | Strong | Very |
| Fixed-price firmware build | Limited | Strong | Very |
| Extending an in-house firmware team | Strong | Strong | Both |
Verdict: Sirin Software vs Very
Sirin Software (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. US contracting entity with a Ukrainian embedded Linux and firmware team.
Very (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need building Nerves-based device software on embedded Linux. If your situation matches that, Very is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Sirin Software vs Very FAQ
Is Sirin Software better than Very?
Sirin Software (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Sirin Software's strongest advantage: embedded Linux, Yocto and Buildroot work is the core of its portfolio. Very's strongest advantage: combines product strategy, design and engineering for teams new to hardware.
How do Sirin Software and Very differ in pricing?
Sirin Software uses time & materials, dedicated team pricing. Very uses time & materials, fixed project pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Sirin Software or Very?
Very is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Sirin Software and Very?
Sirin Software's primary differentiator is: US contracting entity with a Ukrainian embedded Linux and firmware team. Very's primary differentiator is: product-strategy-led IoT development with Nerves and Elixir experience. They also differ in team size (11–50 vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics vs Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.