Indeema Software vs Very: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Indeema Software (4.0/5) edges ahead of Very (3.8/5) overall. Indeema Software is the better choice for IoT products needing device-to-cloud development. Very is the stronger option for US companies building a first connected product. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Indeema Software vs Very: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Indeema Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2011 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in Poland) | USA (fully distributed) |
| Team size | 100–249 | 51–200 |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Hardware, firmware, cloud and app teams under one IoT-focused vendor | Product-strategy-led IoT development with Nerves and Elixir experience |
| Pricing model | Time & materials, fixed project, dedicated team | Time & materials, fixed project |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | C, C++, FreeRTOS | C, Elixir, Nerves |
| Industries served | Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Energy & EV charging | Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Energy & EV charging |
Indeema Software vs Very: overview
Indeema Software
Indeema Software builds connected products from the PCB up to the cloud dashboard. Directories list a 2014 start, and its IoT and industrial IoT division dates from 2015. The company says it now has more than 230 engineers across hardware, firmware, cloud, applications and AI, with engineering centres in Lviv and Wrocław (per company website; independently unverifiable). Its June 2024 purchase of Perfsol extended its work into edge AI. Clutch reviewers describe embedded firmware and multiprotocol connectivity for products such as ventilation systems.
Very
Very is a US IoT engineering firm that grew out of a design and development agency founded in 2011 and now works as a distributed team, with its earlier base in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Directory listings put its size at 51 to 200 people. It builds IoT products across hardware engineering, firmware, mobile apps and data, and it hired a co-author of the Nerves project, which runs Elixir on embedded Linux. Reviews mention hardware, firmware, React Native and AI feature work, so firmware is one part of a broader product offer.
Services and capabilities: Indeema Software vs Very
| Capability | Indeema Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Bare-metal & RTOS firmware | ✓ | ✗ |
| Embedded Linux & BSP | ✗ | ✓ |
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless & IoT connectivity | ✓ | ✓ |
| Secure boot & OTA | ✗ | ✗ |
| FPGA development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware testing & HIL | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Indeema Software vs Very
| Framework / platform | Indeema Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| FreeRTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| Zephyr | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | ✓ |
| Yocto | N/A | N/A |
| AUTOSAR | N/A | N/A |
| STM32 | ✓ | N/A |
| Nordic | ✓ | ✓ |
| NXP | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Indeema Software vs Very
| Criterion | Indeema Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time & materials | Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Indeema Software vs Very
| Dimension | Indeema Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Energy & EV charging | Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Energy & EV charging |
| Best use cases | Building a connected HVAC controller with a cloud dashboard, Adding Wi-Fi and BLE to an existing industrial device | Taking a first IoT product from concept to pilot, Building Nerves-based device software on embedded Linux |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Indeema Software vs Very: pros and cons
| Indeema Software | |
|---|---|
| + | One vendor for device firmware, cloud back end and mobile app |
| + | Wrocław engineering centre gives an EU delivery option |
| + | Perfsol acquisition adds AI and edge AI skills |
| - | Absorbed Perfsol in 2024, so integration of the two teams is recent |
| - | Headcount and founding dates differ between sources |
| - | Less public evidence of regulated medical or automotive firmware |
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | Combines product strategy, design and engineering for teams new to hardware |
| + | Nerves experience is rare and useful for Elixir-based device software |
| + | Delivers the device, app and data platform together |
| - | Firmware is one part of a product agency offer |
| - | US rates without a lower-cost offshore option |
| - | Office location and headcount details vary between sources |
Who should choose Indeema Software?
A typical fit: building a connected HVAC controller with a cloud dashboard.
Hardware, firmware, cloud and app teams under one IoT-focused vendor. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Energy & EV charging.
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: taking a first IoT product from concept to pilot.
Product-strategy-led IoT development with Nerves and Elixir experience. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics, Energy & EV charging.
Decision matrix: Indeema Software vs Very
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Indeema Software |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Indeema Software |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Indeema Software (Not disclosed) vs Very (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Indeema Software |
| You need engineers to extend your own firmware team | Indeema Software |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Indeema Software vs Very
| Use case | Indeema Software fit | Very fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building a connected HVAC controller with a cloud dashboard | Strong | Limited | Indeema Software |
| Adding Wi-Fi and BLE to an existing industrial device | Strong | Limited | Indeema Software |
| Taking a first IoT product from concept to pilot | Limited | Strong | Very |
| Building Nerves-based device software on embedded Linux | Limited | Strong | Very |
| Fixed-price firmware build | Strong | Strong | Both |
| Extending an in-house firmware team | Strong | Strong | Both |
Verdict: Indeema Software vs Very
Indeema Software (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Development projects. Hardware, firmware, cloud and app teams under one IoT-focused vendor.
Very (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need building Nerves-based device software on embedded Linux. If your situation matches that, Very is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Indeema Software vs Very FAQ
Is Indeema Software better than Very?
Indeema Software (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Indeema Software's strongest advantage: one vendor for device firmware, cloud back end and mobile app. Very's strongest advantage: combines product strategy, design and engineering for teams new to hardware.
How do Indeema Software and Very differ in pricing?
Indeema Software uses time & materials, fixed project, dedicated team pricing. Very uses time & materials, fixed project pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Indeema Software or Very?
Indeema Software is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each service provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Indeema Software and Very?
Indeema Software's primary differentiator is: Hardware, firmware, cloud and app teams under one IoT-focused vendor. Very's primary differentiator is: product-strategy-led IoT development with Nerves and Elixir experience. They also differ in team size (100–249 vs 51–200), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics vs Industrial IoT, Consumer electronics).
Verify all details directly with each service provider before making a decision.